Medical treatment of SUNCT and SUNA: a prospective open-label study including single-arm meta-analysis.

Headache and Facial Pain Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. Department of Neurology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. Education Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. Headache and Facial Pain Group, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. Headache and Facial Pain Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK manjit.matharu@ucl.ac.uk.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2021;(3):233-241

Other resources

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The management of short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA) remains challenging in view of the paucity of data and evidence-based treatment recommendations are missing. METHODS In this single-centre, non-randomised, prospective open-label study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of oral and parenteral treatments for SUNCT and SUNA in a real-world setting. Additionally, single-arm meta-analyses of the available reports of SUNCT and SUNA treatments were conducted. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 161 patients. Most patients responded to lamotrigine (56%), followed by oxcarbazepine (46%), duloxetine (30%), carbamazepine (26%), topiramate (25%), pregabalin and gabapentin (10%). Mexiletine and lacosamide were effective in a meaningful proportion of patients but poorly tolerated. Intravenous lidocaine given for 7-10 days led to improvement in 90% of patients, whereas only 27% of patients responded to a greater occipital nerve block. No statistically significant differences in responders were observed between SUNCT and SUNA. In the meta-analysis of the pooled data, topiramate was found to be significantly more effective in SUNCT than SUNA patients. However, a higher proportion of SUNA than SUNCT was considered refractory to medications at the time of the topiramate trial, possibly explaining this isolated difference. CONCLUSIONS We propose a treatment algorithm for SUNCT and SUNA for clinical practice. The response to sodium channel blockers indicates a therapeutic overlap with trigeminal neuralgia, suggesting that sodium channels dysfunction may be a key pathophysiological hallmark in these disorders. Furthermore, the therapeutic similarities between SUNCT and SUNA further support the hypothesis that these conditions are variants of the same disorder.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Comparative Study ; Meta-Analysis

Metadata